Nikon 50mm AF-S vs AF-D
This article is a comparison between the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S lens versus the older Nikon 50mm f/1.4D AF-D.
First of all, I want to start out by saying that the Nikon 50mm f/1.4 is my favorite low-light and portrait lens. The Nikon 50mm f/1.4D lens was one of my first lenses that I bought and I have been using it more than any other lens, even today. I was very excited when the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G came out, because I loved the older version and couldn't imagine how good the new one would be with all of the new enhancements that Nikon has been adding to their line of lenses. So, as soon as the update came out, I pre-ordered one from B&H and started using it more than the older version for my everyday photography needs. I use it for all indoors/low-light photography and especially to photograph my two boys.
1) Key differences
- Autofocus Speed, Internal Focus Motor: Just like the AF-D version, the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G has no internal focus motor, which is why the autofocus speed on both lenses is slow. I was expecting the new "AF-S" version to be faster, but unfortunately, it is actually slower than the older lens. When both lenses cannot acquire focus, the time it takes for the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G to go from infinity to 0.45m (on the distance scale) and back to infinity is about twice longer compared to the older "D" version. When I tested both cameras to focus from infinity to a nearby object, it was very clear that the newer lens acquires focus slower than the older version. But it is an extreme case and you are probably not going to see many situations where you have to go from infinity to close distance. For photographing my kids indoors that move non-stop, the new AF-S version focused almost as fast as the old one and I did not see any focus problems with it. In addition, the new 50mm f/1.4G is "AF-S", which means Autofocus with a Silent Wave Motor, the autofocus will function on all entry-level cameras such as Nikon D40/D60/D3000 and D5000 that have no autofocus motor in the camera body (the older Nikon 50mm f/1.4D or Nikon 50mm f/1.8D will not autofocus on these cameras). With the Silent Wave Motor, the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G is also much quieter than the older version.
- Optics and Sharpness: Optically, the new 50mm AF-S lens has more elements - 8 elements in 7 groups, compared to 7 elements in 6 groups in the older lens. While Nikon did not use any of the new "N" (nano-coated) glass in the new lens, sharpness-wise, the new 50mm f/1.4G is slightly sharper than the older version, especially wide open (see samples below).
- Aperture Ring: The new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G is a "G" lens, and therefore, has no aperture ring (the old one does). Not a concern if you are shooting digital, but you cannot use it with the older manual focus film cameras.
- Bokeh (Background Blur): The older f/1.4D lens has 7 straight blades in its diaphragm, which results in a heptagon-shaped bokeh. The new 50mm f/1.4G lens has 9 rounded blades, producing a much more pleasant round-shaped bokeh. When shooting at maximum aperture, there is a visible amount of "outlining" in the bokeh (also present on the older 50mm lens), which is a visible line around the bokeh circle. But if you stop the lens down to f/2.0 or higher, this outlining effect pretty much disappears, making the bokeh look much smoother.
- Manual Focus Operation: One of the annoyances of the older Nikon 50mm f/1.4D, was the fact that you could not manually focus the lens while it was set for autofocus - you had to change the camera to "Manual" focus. With the new 50mm "G", this problem is eliminated - you can either set the lens to "M/A" mode, which means "Autofocus with Manual Override" or "M" mode, which is fully manual. This is nice, because I now do not have to remember to change a camera switch in order to manually focus in extreme conditions.
- Filter size: The filter size on the f/1.4G version is 58mm, while the older f/1.4D's filter size is 52mm.
- Lens front Rotation and use with Filters: While the 58mm is not a standard filter size for 50mm lenses, the good news is that the lens thread on the new Nikon 50mm AF-S does not rotate when the camera autofocuses. In the older AF-D version, the lens barrel would change depending on the distance between the camera and the subject. I personally found this a little annoying on the older lens, because dust particles would occasionally get in between. Because of this, you will find that keeping the new 50mm lens clean is easier than the old one.
- Handling and weight: Both lenses are very lightweight (new 290g, old 260g) and are both great to handle. The only key difference worth noting is that the new 50mm AF-S lens has a larger barrel compared to the old 50mm lens.
- Vignetting/Light falloff: There is moderate vignetting visible at maximum aperture (f/1.4) on both lenses, which is practically eliminated when stopped down to f/2.0.
- Lens hood and Flare: The Nikon 50mm f/1.4G now comes with a lens hood! This is great, because the older version did not, and you had to buy it separately. When it comes to flare, I found that it is quite controllable on both lenses.
- Distortion: The new 50mm AF-S has a little more distortion than the older AF-D version. It is not heavily noticeable though and can be fixed in post-production, if it becomes an issue. Again, this is not a lens for architectural photography, so the distortion does not bother me at all.
2) Lens sharpness test at maximum aperture
The new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S is definitely a little sharper wide open than its predecessor. As can be seen from the below screenshots, the difference is certainly visible at maximum aperture. At f/2.8 and above, the lenses perform equally well, although the new 50mm tends to have slightly better corner sharpness all the way to f/5.6.

Nikon 50mm f1.4D AF-D @ f1.4

Nikon 50mm f1.4G AF-S @ f1.4
3) Final verdict and recommendations
So, is the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G worth the upgrade? Absolutely! Although the focus speed is slightly slower when compared to the older 50mm AF-D lens, there are many more benefits to the new 50mm lens, including increased sharpness and better bokeh. Those two reasons alone are worth the difference in pricing between the old 50mm and the new one. I personally shoot the 50mm lenses at near maximum aperture to get a shallow depth of field, so the improved performance at wide apertures is very important for me.
The Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S is also my wife's most favorite lens that she uses for all of her food photography. She loves the fact that the lens is very compact, light and yet produces stunningly beautiful images. She heavily uses this lens for wedding and other event photography as well.
Related posts:





01/20/2010 - 13:48
i don’t know about nikon, but the boys are too sweet:) lucky you!
01/20/2010 - 14:12
Lia, thank you! Yes, I am very lucky to have such a wonderful family! :)
01/23/2010 - 07:49
Amazing articles, I really enjoy the food and photography articles. Very interesting review.
01/23/2010 - 11:37
Faizul, you are most welcome! Thank you for your feedback :)
02/13/2010 - 13:27
Thank you for this article. I just got the lower end model the 1.4D recently and had a choice to get the 1.4S but was not sure if I should “pay up” the difference. I was thinking for my needs I don’t need to (only for my blog) but reading this, I wish I had! Maybe next time! Anyway, great site – will be back more often!
02/14/2010 - 02:37
Trissa, thank you for your feedback! Do not worry about the difference – 50mm f/1.4D is still a beautiful lens. It gave me so many great pictures and I still use it quite a bit on our D300 body.
Your website is very nice, good luck with your photography! :)
02/17/2010 - 18:45
Hey Nasim,
What do you think of the 50mm 1.8D for food photography? The reason I ask is that there seems to be rather large price differential between the 1.4 and 1.8
02/17/2010 - 18:55
Asha, the 50mm f/1.8D lens will work great for food photography, as long as your camera has an autofocus motor. If you have a basic camera like the Nikon D40/D40x/D3000/D5000/D60, you will need to get an AF-S lens such as Nikon 35mm f/1.8G.
Hope this helps.
02/25/2010 - 06:44
Nasim..
Will i get those beautiful panorama and food picture quality (as per attached by u) if i use d5000 with Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S.
Thanks.
02/26/2010 - 01:06
Harmanizan, the image quality truly depends more on the quality of light, rather than the type of lens you are using. We have recently experimented with the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 DX lens and we loved it so much that my wife now wants one for her food photography.
What are you shooting with today?
02/26/2010 - 08:44
Nasim,,
Act, i did not buy yet (d5000).
maybe tomorrow i will buy it..
i hope so.. i will inform u after i get that. ;)
Now, im trying to get info about d5000.
To be honest, im truly zero in DSLR.
After 1 week research about what u have writing,
totally its help me mate..!
I think d5000 is suitable for person like me which is interested to get in here and start to take profesional picture.
yeah, im waiting for tomorrow… ;)
02/26/2010 - 13:50
Harmanizan, I would take a serious look at the Nikon D5000 with the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G DX lens as a combo for your first DSLR purchase. The 35mm lens is very inexpensive and delivers superb image quality on a DX body.
02/27/2010 - 21:08
Nasim, i bought it already on yesterday… Yehuuuu… ;)
guess what? Not D5000 but D90..
Heehe..
maybe i cannot sleep for one whole week.. ;)
First choice is D5000 but the salesman promote me to get D90.
Based on what u have writing before, its better to spend little bit more money
then invest on D90 right?
Oh ya, can u suggest me any articles or website that show a expressway/summary to use D90? The manual is too complicated to stand.
03/03/2010 - 16:34
Harmanizan, congratulations with your purchase! The Nikon D90 is a superb camera and I love it more than my Nikon D300 :)
It is definitely a good thing that you got the Nikon D90 over D5000 – you got yourself a semi-professional serious camera with great features. I love the fact that there is an LCD screen on top of the camera…don’t know what I would do without it :)
So do not regret it…you have made the right choice and the Nikon D90 will serve you well for a long time!
03/03/2010 - 23:22
Same goes to me Nasim.. ;) Thanks again..
I would like to know, it cames with kit lense 18-105mm 3.5-5.6G.
its suitable for what type of photograpy?
Then, can u suggest me to get 1 more of another lense..?
for your info, i would like to take picture of my family, landscape, close-up, and my wife as my trial modelling. ;)
Thanks for your advise..
03/05/2010 - 00:47
Harmanizan, the 18-105mm lens is a good general lens for wide-angle and medium telephoto work. It is not the best lens in the world, but is good enough for most photography needs.
I would recommend a fast aperture lens as your second lens. Either the excellent Nikon 35mm f/1.8 or the superb Nikon 50mm f/1.4. The 35mm would probably work best on the D90, because the 50mm might seem a little too long…
03/05/2010 - 04:43
Great article! I currently have a 50mm 1.8D. I can’t honestly say that the performance of either 1.4 is enough to make my trade up considering the price difference. However, if/when a time comes that I need to replace it I’ll go for the 1.4S after reading your review!
On thing though…my 1.8D allows me to manual focus when the camera is set to autofocus. The 1.4D really doesn’t?
03/05/2010 - 14:25
Jabari, yeah, the 1.4D does not allow focus override when set to autofocus…
03/11/2010 - 04:19
Sort of an off topic question. My “wish list” of lenses includes…
- Nikkor 14-24mm 2.8
- Nikkor 24-70mm 2.8
- Nikkor 70-200.. 2.8 VRII
Lately I’ve been using my 50mm 1.8 a LOT. It’s got me thinking that I may not really need the 24-70mm. I can “sneaker zoom” the 50mm for the same range. My only concerns are color and contrast. I’ve heard the the 24-70mm is better with both. If the 50mm 1.4G is on par with the 24-70mm in those areas then I’ll get it and put the rest of the money I would have spent on the 70-200mm instead. What are your thoughts on this?
Thanks in advance!