This article is a comparison between the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S lens versus the older Nikon 50mm f/1.4D AF-D.
First of all, I want to start out by saying that the Nikon 50mm f/1.4 is my favorite low-light and portrait lens. The Nikon 50mm f/1.4D lens was one of my first lenses that I bought and I have been using it more than any other lens, even today. I was very excited when the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G came out, because I loved the older version and couldn’t imagine how good the new one would be with all of the new enhancements that Nikon has been adding to their line of lenses. So, as soon as the update came out, I pre-ordered one from B&H and started using it more than the older version for my everyday photography needs. I use it for all indoors/low-light photography and especially to photograph my two boys.
Omar and Osman, captured with the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S lens
1) Key differences
- Autofocus Speed, Internal Focus Motor: Just like the AF-D version, the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G has no internal focus motor, which is why the autofocus speed on both lenses is slow. I was expecting the new “AF-S” version to be faster, but unfortunately, it is actually slower than the older lens. When both lenses cannot acquire focus, the time it takes for the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G to go from infinity to 0.45m (on the distance scale) and back to infinity is about twice longer compared to the older “D” version. When I tested both cameras to focus from infinity to a nearby object, it was very clear that the newer lens acquires focus slower than the older version. But it is an extreme case and you are probably not going to see many situations where you have to go from infinity to close distance. For photographing my kids indoors that move non-stop, the new AF-S version focused almost as fast as the old one and I did not see any focus problems with it. In addition, the new 50mm f/1.4G is “AF-S”, which means Autofocus with a Silent Wave Motor, the autofocus will function on all entry-level cameras such as Nikon D40/D60/D3000 and D5000 that have no autofocus motor in the camera body (the older Nikon 50mm f/1.4D or Nikon 50mm f/1.8D will not autofocus on these cameras). With the Silent Wave Motor, the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G is also much quieter than the older version.
- Optics and Sharpness: Optically, the new 50mm AF-S lens has more elements – 8 elements in 7 groups, compared to 7 elements in 6 groups in the older lens. While Nikon did not use any of the new “N” (nano-coated) glass in the new lens, sharpness-wise, the new 50mm f/1.4G is slightly sharper than the older version, especially wide open (see samples below).
- Aperture Ring: The new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G is a “G” lens, and therefore, has no aperture ring (the old one does). Not a concern if you are shooting digital, but you cannot use it with the older manual focus film cameras.
- Bokeh (Background Blur): The older f/1.4D lens has 7 straight blades in its diaphragm, which results in a heptagon-shaped bokeh. The new 50mm f/1.4G lens has 9 rounded blades, producing a much more pleasant round-shaped bokeh. When shooting at maximum aperture, there is a visible amount of “outlining” in the bokeh (also present on the older 50mm lens), which is a visible line around the bokeh circle. But if you stop the lens down to f/2.0 or higher, this outlining effect pretty much disappears, making the bokeh look much smoother.
- Manual Focus Operation: One of the annoyances of the older Nikon 50mm f/1.4D, was the fact that you could not manually focus the lens while it was set for autofocus – you had to change the camera to “Manual” focus. With the new 50mm “G”, this problem is eliminated – you can either set the lens to “M/A” mode, which means “Autofocus with Manual Override” or “M” mode, which is fully manual. This is nice, because I now do not have to remember to change a camera switch in order to manually focus in extreme conditions.
- Filter size: The filter size on the f/1.4G version is 58mm, while the older f/1.4D’s filter size is 52mm.
- Lens front Rotation and use with Filters: While the 58mm is not a standard filter size for 50mm lenses, the good news is that the lens thread on the new Nikon 50mm AF-S does not rotate when the camera autofocuses. In the older AF-D version, the lens barrel would change depending on the distance between the camera and the subject. I personally found this a little annoying on the older lens, because dust particles would occasionally get in between. Because of this, you will find that keeping the new 50mm lens clean is easier than the old one.
- Handling and weight: Both lenses are very lightweight (new 290g, old 260g) and are both great to handle. The only key difference worth noting is that the new 50mm AF-S lens has a larger barrel compared to the old 50mm lens.
- Vignetting/Light falloff: There is moderate vignetting visible at maximum aperture (f/1.4) on both lenses, which is practically eliminated when stopped down to f/2.0.
- Lens hood and Flare: The Nikon 50mm f/1.4G now comes with a lens hood! This is great, because the older version did not, and you had to buy it separately. When it comes to flare, I found that it is quite controllable on both lenses.
- Distortion: The new 50mm AF-S has a little more distortion than the older AF-D version. It is not heavily noticeable though and can be fixed in post-production, if it becomes an issue. Again, this is not a lens for architectural photography, so the distortion does not bother me at all.
2) Lens sharpness test at maximum aperture
The new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S is definitely a little sharper wide open than its predecessor. As can be seen from the below screenshots, the difference is certainly visible at maximum aperture. At f/2.8 and above, the lenses perform equally well, although the new 50mm tends to have slightly better corner sharpness all the way to f/5.6.
Nikon 50mm f1.4D AF-D @ f1.4
Nikon 50mm f1.4G AF-S @ f1.4
3) Final verdict and recommendations
So, is the new Nikon 50mm f/1.4G worth the upgrade? Absolutely! Although the focus speed is slightly slower when compared to the older 50mm AF-D lens, there are many more benefits to the new 50mm lens, including increased sharpness and better bokeh. Those two reasons alone are worth the difference in pricing between the old 50mm and the new one. I personally shoot the 50mm lenses at near maximum aperture to get a shallow depth of field, so the improved performance at wide apertures is very important for me.
Sunset panorama, captured with Nikon D700 & Nikon 50mm f/1.4D lens
The Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S is also my wife’s most favorite lens that she uses for all of her food photography. She loves the fact that the lens is very compact, light and yet produces stunningly beautiful images. She heavily uses this lens for wedding and other event photography as well.
Shot with Nikon D300 and Nikon 50mm f/1.4G lens @ 1/100, f/4.0
Nasim Mansurov
i don’t know about nikon, but the boys are too sweet:) lucky you!
Lia, thank you! Yes, I am very lucky to have such a wonderful family! :)
Amazing articles, I really enjoy the food and photography articles. Very interesting review.
Faizul, you are most welcome! Thank you for your feedback :)
Thank you for this article. I just got the lower end model the 1.4D recently and had a choice to get the 1.4S but was not sure if I should “pay up” the difference. I was thinking for my needs I don’t need to (only for my blog) but reading this, I wish I had! Maybe next time! Anyway, great site – will be back more often!
Trissa, thank you for your feedback! Do not worry about the difference – 50mm f/1.4D is still a beautiful lens. It gave me so many great pictures and I still use it quite a bit on our D300 body.
Your website is very nice, good luck with your photography! :)
Hey Nasim,
What do you think of the 50mm 1.8D for food photography? The reason I ask is that there seems to be rather large price differential between the 1.4 and 1.8
Asha, the 50mm f/1.8D lens will work great for food photography, as long as your camera has an autofocus motor. If you have a basic camera like the Nikon D40/D40x/D3000/D5000/D60, you will need to get an AF-S lens such as Nikon 35mm f/1.8G.
Hope this helps.
Nasim..
Will i get those beautiful panorama and food picture quality (as per attached by u) if i use d5000 with Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S.
Thanks.
Harmanizan, the image quality truly depends more on the quality of light, rather than the type of lens you are using. We have recently experimented with the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 DX lens and we loved it so much that my wife now wants one for her food photography.
What are you shooting with today?
Nasim,,
Act, i did not buy yet (d5000).
maybe tomorrow i will buy it..
i hope so.. i will inform u after i get that. ;)
Now, im trying to get info about d5000.
To be honest, im truly zero in DSLR.
After 1 week research about what u have writing,
totally its help me mate..!
I think d5000 is suitable for person like me which is interested to get in here and start to take profesional picture.
yeah, im waiting for tomorrow… ;)
Harmanizan, I would take a serious look at the Nikon D5000 with the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G DX lens as a combo for your first DSLR purchase. The 35mm lens is very inexpensive and delivers superb image quality on a DX body.
Nasim, i bought it already on yesterday… Yehuuuu… ;)
guess what? Not D5000 but D90..
Heehe..
maybe i cannot sleep for one whole week.. ;)
First choice is D5000 but the salesman promote me to get D90.
Based on what u have writing before, its better to spend little bit more money
then invest on D90 right?
Oh ya, can u suggest me any articles or website that show a expressway/summary to use D90? The manual is too complicated to stand.
Harmanizan, congratulations with your purchase! The Nikon D90 is a superb camera and I love it more than my Nikon D300 :)
It is definitely a good thing that you got the Nikon D90 over D5000 – you got yourself a semi-professional serious camera with great features. I love the fact that there is an LCD screen on top of the camera…don’t know what I would do without it :)
So do not regret it…you have made the right choice and the Nikon D90 will serve you well for a long time!
Same goes to me Nasim.. ;) Thanks again..
I would like to know, it cames with kit lense 18-105mm 3.5-5.6G.
its suitable for what type of photograpy?
Then, can u suggest me to get 1 more of another lense..?
for your info, i would like to take picture of my family, landscape, close-up, and my wife as my trial modelling. ;)
Thanks for your advise..
Harmanizan, the 18-105mm lens is a good general lens for wide-angle and medium telephoto work. It is not the best lens in the world, but is good enough for most photography needs.
I would recommend a fast aperture lens as your second lens. Either the excellent Nikon 35mm f/1.8 or the superb Nikon 50mm f/1.4. The 35mm would probably work best on the D90, because the 50mm might seem a little too long…
Hi Nasim, great site and i love it!
Could you explain what you do mean by 50mm might seem too long for D90?
Thanks for your attention!
Great article! I currently have a 50mm 1.8D. I can’t honestly say that the performance of either 1.4 is enough to make my trade up considering the price difference. However, if/when a time comes that I need to replace it I’ll go for the 1.4S after reading your review!
On thing though…my 1.8D allows me to manual focus when the camera is set to autofocus. The 1.4D really doesn’t?
Jabari, yeah, the 1.4D does not allow focus override when set to autofocus…
Sort of an off topic question. My “wish list” of lenses includes…
- Nikkor 14-24mm 2.8
- Nikkor 24-70mm 2.8
- Nikkor 70-200.. 2.8 VRII
Lately I’ve been using my 50mm 1.8 a LOT. It’s got me thinking that I may not really need the 24-70mm. I can “sneaker zoom” the 50mm for the same range. My only concerns are color and contrast. I’ve heard the the 24-70mm is better with both. If the 50mm 1.4G is on par with the 24-70mm in those areas then I’ll get it and put the rest of the money I would have spent on the 70-200mm instead. What are your thoughts on this?
Thanks in advance!
Jabari, sorry for a late response. If you are getting the Nikon 14-24mm lens, then I would skip the 24-70mm range and shoot with the 50mm, if necessary.
What body do you shoot with?
No problem! I have a D2X, but I plan to get a D3S in the near future…
Jabari, have you checked out the new Nikon 16-35mm f/4.0 VR lens yet? I find it much better than my Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G and it can take filters.
I have a D300, D700 and D3s and found that this lens performs flawlessly on all Nikon bodies. It is one of the sharpest ultra-wide angle lenses Nikon has made.
Hello Nasim,
I just discovered your blog and I have to say, you have a passion for photography. The framing, sharpness and saturation in your photos are stunning. I have bookmarked your site for future articles.
Anyway, I have a question I think you might be able to help with. I have a D70 with 18-70 f/3.5-4.5 lens. I also have the 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, and a Sigma 70-300 f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro. I am going to upgrade to the new D90 soon, but am not sure about the ‘Kit’ lens (18-105). Do you have any experience with the Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 VRII? I thought about the Nikon 18-200 VRII, but from all the reviews I read (and samples I saw), I don’t think it is as good. The only other lens I am looking at is Tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC. I don’t want to spend $$ for the Nikon 17-55 2.8. I take mostly indoor photographs of kids and gatherings (with and w/o a dedicated flash).
On a separate note: I do not use my non-VR 18-70 lens that often now-a-days. My 50mm and 85mm prime lenses produce much better pictures (even my Sigma zoom does). I hope the VR or VC does make a difference. May be the newer CMOS sensor in the D90 creates better images. However, do you think that the 16-85 (with a 35mm f/1.8 down the road) or the Tamron 17-50 (w/constant 2.8 aperture and a VC) would be a better choice? Thanks.
Mahmood, thanks for stopping by and dropping a comment! I’m glad you liked our pictures and our website :)
As far as the lens, I personally wouldn’t buy the kit lens or the 16-85mm and would go for the 35mm f/1.8 instead…
Nasim, thanks for your fast reply. I am seriously considering Nikon 35mm f/1.8 as part of my gear in the near future. I have found the 85mm f/1.8 to be an excellent portrait lens (better than the 50mm f/1.8) and coupled with the 35mm f/1.8, it would provide me the capabilities of indoor low-light snapshots and group pictures (thus eliminating the need for a dedicated 50mm prime). Having said that, I still need to decide on an all around zoom lens for convenience and flexibility. That’s why I am trying to decide on the following:
# Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 VRII
# Tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC
# Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VRI
# Tamron 17-50 f2.8 (non VC)
# Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 VRI
# Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 VRII
My obvious choice are the first two. The 18-200mm VRII is a very popular lens for obvious reasons, but if changing lenses is not a hinderance, there are other cost effective options (e.g., 18-55 and 55-200) that give better end results. Remember, I came to this conclusion not because I own any of these lenses, but because I’ve read hundreds of reviews, opinions, and articles on them. Please tell me if I am wrong. So my question is, do I gain anything significant by opting for the Nikon 16-85 or the Tamron, or I’ll be just fine with the 18-105 kit lens? Thanks again from Raleigh, NC.
Mahmood, considering that Nikon is giving away $300 on the Nikon D90 and 18-200mm VR II lens combo, I would suggest getting the 18-200mm VR II (it is a great value). None of the other lenses you listed above currently have rebates…
If you need the 18-200mm range, do not bother with getting two separate lenses. While you might get a slightly better performance with the two lenses separately, having to constantly change lenses is inconvenient and will add more dust to your sensor.
The rebates end this weekend, so I would hurry up if I were you. Here is the link for the rebates page with all current deals.
With the $300 rebate, I wouldn’t bother looking at the 18-105.
Hope this helps.
Thanks for the reply. Much appreciated.
Thanks for the review! I was also looking at Ken Rockwell’s page on these lenses, but I still can’t decide between the two.
I’m currently shooting from a Nikon D90 and I’m getting into concert photography.
The 50mm f/1.4 really stood out to me because of it’s large aperture and ability to take sharp pictures, but I’m torn as to whether I should get the older AF-D or the new f/1.4g AF-S. Could I get your opinion on this? I’m a fairly amateur photographer and I’m not too well versed in these things yet.
Thanks!
Ben, go with the newer Nikon 50mm f/1.4G – it is sharper and has better bokeh.
I think you have a mistake on your article, the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S has an internal focus motor, it has a silent wave motor, which allows it to AF with cameras like Nikon D40/D60 D3000/D5000.
If you want a fast AF, I would go for the Sigma 50mm F1.4.
oops.. my mistake… did not read the rest of the article til now… my apologies…
No problem :) Please let me know if you have any questions.
Hello,
I’m choosing between these two lens.
Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4G vs 35mm f/1.8G
I’ve checked through the reviews but couldn’t really finalise what I need. Of course the 50f1.4 price is higher than 35f1.8.
Which is better performer for indoor shots?
Shalom, what camera body do you have, and what is the reason for wanting to purchase the 50mm or 35mm lens?
If you have a DX camera and you are looking for a normal lens to be used in low-light environments, then the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G is excellent. If you need a true portrait lens, however, the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G would be a better choice.
Nasim and Shalom,
I owned both Nikon 35mm f/1.8G and Nikon 50mm f/1.4G on my D90. They both are excellent lenses. The bokeh on the 50mm f/1.4G is superb. Nice creamy and round. I’m glad I got it over the AF-D version. Thanks Nasim for nice articles and lens comparison.
Peng, thank you for your feedback!
portrait shooting.
i guess that 35mm f/1.8G is more value for my learning curve. I haven’t own a DX body yet, prefer D90. I’m using Canon Rebel T2i now. Thanks for your reply.
Shalom, you are welcome! Yes, 35mm f/1.8G is a great start!
Hi Nasim,
I am a novice at SLRs and professional photography. I have recently purchased a Nikon D3000 (mostly because it fit into my budget :-| ) and am smitten by its features and capabilities. I am currently exploring the camera and taking a pic here and there when I find time.
I need some advice from you. I am currently using the bundled lens (AF-S DX 18-55mm VR f/3.5-5.6G). Could you please tell me what sort of photos this camera/lens is best suited for? Any comments/feedback on this camera?
The manual supplied with the camera is a bit too complex and technical to comprehend… :-(. Could you please suggest some website which would help me pick up some good photo capturing techniques?
Thanks in advance,
Savan D.
Savan, the 18-55mm is a general-purpose lens, so you can take any pictures with it.
As far as general tips, have you seen my “Photography Tips for Beginners” page? It contains many basic articles for beginners.
Hi Nasim,
Reading so many comments and articles online actually made me more confused :).
I have a D60 right now and I wanted to get a D90 in the near future sometime. I wanted to buy a 50mm portrait type of lens right now though. I was also hoping to use it more versatile if possible (maybe also do some macro shots?)
I know D60s don’t have AutoFocus in the camera body so the lenses have to have them. D90 however does have it in the body. So what lens should I get which will allow me to take photos with my D60 until I have the funds to buy a D90? (will a lens AF conflict with a body’s AF?)
I was confused between this article’s 50mm f/1.4G, 50mm f/1.4D, 50mm f/1.8G?, 35mm f/1.8.
I’m still just learning but wanted to take it further. I currently just have the kit lens (18-55mm and the 80-200 zoom lens).
Can you clarify and help? I don’t need a long answer, maybe you can point me somewhere? Thanks!
Btw, great article and website. Am going though it now, thanks!
Okay, so from your previous post about Nikon naming convention (http://mansurovs.com/nikon-lens-nomenclature), you say that AF-S lenses have Autofocus built in. But B&H says the lens you talk about above does not work on a D60 (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=product.jsp&A=getpage&Q=nikonsilentwave.jsp).. :\?
Sirisha, if you look at the link you provided once again, you will see that the camera listed is N60, not D60.
Ooooh I’m so sorry!! Thanks for pointing that out! So much fine print to read. Sorry!
Thank you for your feedback Sirisha!
Sirisha, get the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G or Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S – both will work with the Nikon D60 and D90.
I bought the 50mm f/1.4G lens :), thanks for the tips!
Sirisha, you are most welcome!
nice to see you sharing your knowledge and passion- I was trying to decide firstly between the 1.8 and 1.4 and then between the 1.4D and G, but you’ve definently steered me to the 1.4G. I primarily take newborn photography but also want to get some great outdoor portraits-I must say I’m in love with good bokeh and you article has really helped me- thanyou so much I appreciate it.
Don, you are most welcome! You will not be disappointed with the 50mm f/1.4G, for sure :)
Good luck with your photography!
hi nasim,
i using d3000 for couple of months now…. after looked at most of your comments, i try to search for the price of those lenses that you recommended… the price quite a boom for me as a newbie in this field… the one that catched my eyes was spec. AF Nikkor 50mm F1.8D …. affordable but not sure about the performance with my non AF motor DSLR…. do hope your advice for this lense…. if it’s good i will buy this as my first purchase of DSLR lense…. cherios…
Farid, don’t buy the Nikon 50mm f/1.8D, because it will NOT autofocus on your D3000. You certainly do not want to be manually focusing a portrait lens, especially if you are a beginner.
For a little more in price, you can also get the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G lens, which is a great buy for a DX camera. It is very sharp and works great for low-light environments.
Thank you for the nice post and your replies for almost every response.
I have got D3000 and 50 mm f/1.8D! Do you have any suggestions or recommendations for manual focusing practice? Buying 35MM f/1.8G is not an option for me, at-least now :(.
Mujahid, it would be tough to get 100% accurate focus at maximum apertures due to shallow depth of field. What I would do, is try to shoot at f/2.8 and above and watch your focus through viewfinder while rotating the focus ring on the lens. Don’t forget to set your lens focus switch to “M”.
It is tough, but you can certainly get pretty good with manual focusing if you practice enough. Definitely review your images after each shot to see what you need to work on.
hey!! nasim
i am usin a nikon d90…i am confused bw 50mm 1.4 g or 1.4 d….from the reviews came to know 1.4 d images are sharper and is a better lens than 1.4 g..it seems to be the sharpest among 50mm leans except for the bokey..is that true..which one do i but..as i am having d90 do u think 1.4 d will give me good results
Siju, where did you see in reviews that the 50mm f/1.4D is sharper than 50mm f/1.4G? It should be the other way around. The Nikon 50mm f/1.4G is newer and certainly sharper than the 50mm f/1.4D, especially when shooting at maximum aperture. And bokeh certainly looks better on the newer “G” lens, because the older “D” lens has a 7 blade diaphragm which produces heptagon-shaped bokeh.
If I were you, I would certainly go for the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G.
thank you !! Nasim!! ,all i want to know is is it worth the $ 150 extra for 1.4 g when i have d90 in which autofocus will work for 1.4 d right?
Siju, sorry for a late response. Sharpness-wise, the 1.4G is worth the extra $150 in my opinion. And yes, the 1.4D and the 1.8D will work on the D90.
thanks for the advice nasim…. i will consider the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G instead of 50mm f/1.8D….
You are most welcome!
hey nasim!!
what do u think of 16-85mm lens…is it better than 18-105 in pic quality…is it worth spending extra buck for that lens in place of 16-85mm
Siju, unless you need a wider angle, go for the 18-105mm lens instead.
Hi Siju,
I struggled a lot deciding what walk-around lens to buy to go with my new D90 body when I upgraded from D70+18-70 combo. I considered the Nikon 18-105 VRI, Nikon 16-85 VRII, Nikon 18-200 VRII, Sigma 17-70 2.8-4 OS, and Tamron 17-50 2.8 VC. The Nikon 18-70 is an excellent lens, but the lack of VR or high aperture was making me use it less and less than my prime lenses, especially indoors. I finally decided on the 16-85 VRII and I am happy I did.
The 18-200 is an excellent lens for someone who wants the convenience of a larger zoom range with VRII, doesn’t want to change lenses and risk dust on the sensor. In my experience, the sensor will collect dust eventually after years of use anyway, and a advanced amateur photographer has to have the tools and know-how to clean the dust by his own. Besides, IMHO, a single lens cannot give you the picture quality of a combination of primes+zooms. I didn’t want to invest on a non-Nikon lens for my primary walk-around, so the decision was between the 18-105 and 16-85. Here are the reasons why I went with the 16-85: 2 ED and 3 ASP, compared to 1 ED and 1 ASP in 18-105, much better build quality, metal mount, rubber dust gasket seal (it is important), VRII, sharper (particularly in the corners – very important for me), distance scale, less distortion & the extra 2mm. The 18-105 produces excellent image quality according to most reviews and for a casual shooter, that should be enough given the price difference.
The 16-85 is a superb lens for landscape, travel, outdoor photography, and group photos with good light. The VRII helps a lot with low shutter speeds. However, it is not good enough for low-light indoor photos (neither are the 18-200 or 18-105 lenses). So, one has to change lenses and go with a faster lens. I have the 50mm 1.8 and 85mm 1.8. I will probably buy the Nikon 35mm 1.5 as Nasim mentioned or the Tamron 17-50 2.8 VC if I can spend some more (and sell the 50mm 1.8).
I agree that it is a little overpriced given that it doesn’t have high aperture on the long end, so I didn’t buy it new. I bought it used for a reasonable price and fortunately it is working good for me. Hope this helps.
Mahmood, thank you for sharing, that’s a lot of great information for Siju and other readers. Enjoy your 16-85mm, I’m sure it is a great lens!
I’m hoping to test the 16-85mm within the next several weeks, so stay tuned :)
Quick question…. I have D90 and when using with 50 mm f1.4G Nikkor lens the camera does not always let me take a picture…sometimes it does and sometimes it does not…I could not figure out why ..does it have to do with camera auto-focus ( maybe it is too slow …) …maybe camera does not allow to be shot when the subject is out of focus..or maybe it is something else…anybody else had a problem like that?Typically it behaves like that when is darker …any suggestion?
Thanks
Zoran, that’s because you probably have it set to “Single” mode and your autofocus is set to only shoot when your subject is in 100% focus. You can either change your shooting mode to “Continous” focus or “AF-C” or change your autofocus settings so that it lets you fire even when there is no focus on the subject.
Sorry for a late response. Let me know if you have any questions.
Hello Nasim:
This is the most complete article that I could found!! I was been searching a lot because I am interesting in buying one, I am a beginner photography’s student in Mexico, I have the Nikon D5000 and the classical 18-55 and a 55-200, but they are not enough I need better pics with the minimal light so that I need very lightly lens, I was hesitated between 1.4D and 1.4G.
Thanks!! :)
Liliana, thank you for your feedback and you are most welcome!
Yes, go for the Nikon 50mm 1.4G and you won’t be disappointed :)
Hi Nasim, Thanks for the interesting article. I saw in a used-lens shop recently both a 50mm 1.4D and a 50mm 1.4S, which was slightly cheaper than the D. However, I can’t find much info about the S version, do you happen to know anything about it, and whether it’s any good? Thanks in advance.
Trev, yes, the 50mm f/1.4s lens is a very old version of the 50mm from some early productions. See more info here.
I would not buy the s version – get the 1.4D instead, which will definitely work on most modern bodies with built-in autofocus.
Hope this helps.
Hi Nasim,
Can you explain futher please what you mean about 50mm f/1.4 G thats more longer on D90?
So in your opinion what would you prefer on D90 50mm f/1.4G or 35mm f/1.8G ?
Thanks again….
Jeff, the 50mm f/1.4G is “longer” than the 35mm f/1.8G on a D90 due to the 1.5x crop factor associated with Nikon DX cameras that are NOT full frame (D90 is a DX camera). When you do the maths i.e., 1.5 times the focal length, your effective view using the 50mm will be 75mm which is ‘longer’ than the 52.5mm that you effectively see using the 35mm f/1.8G. For this reason, I bought the 35mm f/1.8G. At only $200, its arguably the best price/pic quality value lens on the market today. I use it for about 80% of my shooting (as my walking around lens) except for the 20% times I need longer reach where I use the 55-200mm. I hope that helps.
Obi, thank you for your detailed answer, you nailed it.
Jeff, sorry for a late response, been super busy lately :(
Just like Obi stated below, 50mm might feel a little too long because of the crop factor on the sensor, which makes it a 75mm equivalent lens. What this means, is that you will see only a certain portion of the scene, but not the whole thing, sort of like if you were looking through binoculars (except not that long). The Nikon 50mm is great for portraits, but might be too long for everything else…
If you find yourself taking pictures of portraits more than everything else, go for the 50mm. Otherwise, go for the 35mm or shorter focal length lenses.
Hope this helps.
Nasim
thanks for that great info. so this 38mm f/1.8 G is more suitable to my D90. well nice to hear that its more affordable yet a great lens. thanx again Nasim
Jeff, no worries, Obi answered first :)
Obi
My mistake, i thought t was Nasim who replied.lol well thanks again for yor respond atleast i had an idea now whats more apt to my d90.. I tried to buy directly on best buy but they dont have any stock in store. maybe my luck next time for 35 mm.
thanks again Obi
Jeff, why don’t you try B&H instead? It should be cheaper, plus you don’t have to pay taxes…
Jeff, I bought mine at best buy but had to drive an hour away b/c the 4 closer stores did not have it in stock. You can order thru amazon if you are willing to wait for shipping. Good luck.
Obi, was it cheaper in best buy than B&H/Adorama/Amazon or you got it there because you wanted it so bad? :)
Jeff, I paid $199 at best buy, only $2 more than the amazon price of $197. But I also wanted it badly at the time.
I just got the D90 with the 18-105 a week ago and yesterday ordered the 50mm/f1.8D (only $125). Here are the reasons I chose this one as my first prime lens:
1. Since i spent more money getting the D90, i can leverage the internal camera motor to choose a cheaper lens
2. I looked thru my 18-105 set at 35mm and 50mm, and 50mm did feel a little long but i could actually take nice indoor close-ups without having to get too close to the people (got more natural poses)
3. The price for 50mm/f1.4g or d was too high. couldn’t decide whether the 1.8 to 1.4 upgrade was worth so much. is the f aperture a linear or exponential scale?
4. I read somewhere that Nikon may stop making the 50mm/f1.8D lens since it a money loser for them, so i wanted to get it while i can
Now awaiting the lens. Hopefully, i wouldn’t want to upgrade too soon to yet another lens. does the 35mm come in f1.4G, haven;t seen that anywhere.
Bipin
Bipin, thank you for your feedback, I’m sure others will find it useful :) No, there is no 35mm f/1.4G yet…hopefully later this year.
I have one lingering question that I thought i might be able to get a clear answer to just by researching on the internet but haven’t so far.
My new 50mm/f1.8D will have an aperture ring on the lens. Can the camera override the manual aperture setting on the lens ring? e.g. what if I am indoors and have set the lens ring at f1.8 and then go outdoors where I only need say f11, do I have to remember to do this on the lens aperture ring or can the camera manage it in the Auto mode?
Thanks,
Bipin
never mind, i just read on Yahoo Answers that i am supposed to lock the lens aperture ring at f/22 and then let the camera do the adjusting as necessary. I’ll try the A-priority mode though.
Bipin
Bipin, just noticed your comment. Yes, you will lock it at minimum aperture and everything will work as expected.
Obi and Nasim,
Yeah its nice to order but in my situation its so hard, I am not a US citizen. Im working in a ship and luckily every month we are in US so we could buy something useful. maybe next time I can have it with me. For now I need to study more on my D90 plus its kit for a moment and really love it so much.hehehehe
Thanks Obi and Nasim
No problem Jeff, enjoy your D90!
I had a quick question for you. I love the article by the way! I have a Nikon D200 and have the 50mm AF-D lens right now. I do mostly portraits. I have just started my business. I’m having trouble in low light situations getting the sharpness that I want. Would the AF-S 50mm lens work well with the D200? Will I notice enough difference in the pictures to make it worth the money? Also one more question if you are familiar with the D200, what focus zone do you use the most for portraits. I found it to be a bit confusing on deciding which one to use for what. I mainly do families and children. Thank you for your help!
Randi
Randi
Randi, if you already have the AF-D version of the 50mm, there is no need to buy the AF-S version. You probably need to learn how to focus well with it. Focusing in low-light situations is tough and I would suggest using the AF assist lamp on your camera in “S” (single) mode to help you get better focus.
In terms of focus zone, I use single area focus in most cases, unless I have a moving subject (in which case I would switch to dynamic area AF).
Hope this helps.
hello Nasim
hey i have been goin through the reviews of nikon 85mm 1.8d lens…found that this is one of the best in nikons,have u tried this out..it seems it is pretty sharp at almost any aperture..
pls advice
siju
Siju, yes, the Nikon 85mm f/1.8D is an excellent lens for portraiture. Very sharp and contrasty, good bokeh (not as beautiful as the 1.4D obviously).
Hi Mr Nasim,
First of all, your site is truly magnificent for a newbie photographer like me. I chanced upon your site by accident while searching for infos on 50mm F/1.4G.
I need your advice. I’m currently using a Nikon d5000 with the kit lens, 18-55mm. I want to take better portraiture pictures and after doing some research many suggested i get either a 50mm f/1.4G AF-s or the 85mm f/3.5G. Honestly, I think both are out of my budget.
If you could, can you advice me which compatible lens is suitable for portraiture and less expensive than the 2 I mentioned?and is it really necessary for me to get a lens with a AF-s if I just want to use it to take portraits? -TIA-
Muhd, thank you for stopping buy and leaving a comment.
If budget is an issue, why don’t you get the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G lens instead? It is a great little portrait lens for only $200.
Nasim
What do you think about the 50 1.8 ? I find mine almost as good as the 50 1.4
Your site is very interesting, well done
Daniel, the Nikon 50mm f/1.8D is also good, but not as good as the f/1.4 when it comes to bokeh.
Hi Nasim
With your advice, I bought a D90 and loving it totally. Now I am shopping for a prime lens and am deciding between a Nikkor 35mm 1.8 or Nikkor 50mm 1.4g to go with my D90. I hope that you can help me on this. I like to take close ups.
Thanks.
Karen
Karen, go for the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G – you won’t regret it :)
First to say that you have a really great website for Nikon users.
I like using the Nikon f1.4D @ f1.4 however at this aperture the center is soft. Is there anyway to overcome this? I apply higher In-camera sharpening and contrast when I shoot with this lens at f1.4, Is mine method proper? Do you have an alternative remedy? Please advice.
Sorry forget to mention that I am refering to the Nikon 50mm f1.4D. Thanks in advance.
Yeow, shooting the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G @ f/1.4 can yield soft results due to a) shallow depth of field and b) improper focus. I personally rarely shoot it at f/1.4 and would suggest to shoot at f/2.0-f/4.0. If you need better bokeh, just stand closer to the subject. Shooting wide open on the AF-D model will also have soft corners and plenty of vignetting.
I just bought the Nikon 50mm f1.4G 2 days ago, love it!
Ken, congratulations! The Nikon 50mm f/1.4G is an excellent lens.
Hi Nasim
I am a very big fan of yours.
I am using d3x and many good lenses.I just sold my 24-70mm f2.8 and bougt 24mm 1.4 and af-s 60mm micro G and liked it a lot but it has focus issues with d3x because of absence of focus limiter and it is to narrow for me so I am looking for 50mm af-s .I have more macro lenses so the thing I need is a mid range lens.What do you think about it?
After that considering your reviews I want to buy a 16-35 vr which would be great with 50mm but they say that lens has problems with high resolution of d3x.Do you think the same?
If you say buy 16-35 than do you thing I need 24mm 1.4 in that case?
By the way I mostly shot nature,macro and landscapes.Just a little bit portrait.
Thanks
Ahmed, thank you for your feedback, I appreciate it!
Can I ask why you need the 50mm or 60mm lenses? What type of photography are you trying to do? Also, in terms of 16-35mm, are you interested in it because of its ultra-wide capabilities? Since you are on a D3x, I would suggest to go with the 14-24mm f/2.8G instead, because it is sharper. Yes, I have also heard about low performance of the 16-35mm on the D3x, so I would not take the risk. After your 24mm f/1.4, most lenses will look like crap now, including the 16-35mm ;-)
Yes, I would keep the 24mm f/1.4 – it is certainly Nikon’s sharpest wide angle lens.
After reading all the articles on this page my head is spinning. I presently have a D90 with the 18-105 and a 70-300 mm lens. I’m shopping for a an all around lens to use for portraits. You have mention a few times about the 50mm 1.4 giving a barrel look. I mean that it’s goes to 75mm because being a DX. Would it be smarter to purchase the 35mm 1.8 or the 35 mm 1.4. Thanks for your help. P.S. also like to take family pictures……
Tom, if you are shooting headshots or half body shots, the Nikon 50mm f/1.4 is ideal, even on DX. If you want full body portraits, then the 35mm might be a little more practical.
Nasim, I have D5000 with 35mm 1.8 AF-S DX. I’m thinking about purchasing 50mm 1.4 AF-S and wondering if it’s worth the upgrade? I’m also planning to upgrade to FX sooner or later, so I think it’s worth it but what do you think? Upgrade now or later when I get my FX.
Eric, upgrade later when you get FX – the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G is a great lens for DX.
Thank you for your article, I really love it. I read almost all your lens review. Really love your pictures and your careful review.
I have D5000 and 2 lenses kit: 18-55 and 55-200. I think I will use 18-55 for family photos so I’ll buy a 50mm f1.4 for portrait and night shooting.
In future, I will buy a wide lens for landscape. I think 17-35 is better than 14-24 because it can use filter to protect the lens. Do you think that it is valuable to buy 17-35 f2.8 than 17-35 f4 VR?
Nasim, I got my D3. I’m currently using 50mm 1.8 af-d and looking to get maybe 1.4 version. At the moment, I’m not too sure if it would be worth the upgrade or should I spend money for other fast lens like wide angle zoom or even mid range zoom like 24-70 2.8f. I will have to decide sooner or later. but right now, just enjoying my d3 ! Thanks for the great site Nasim!