Here is one more fall panorama that I worked on today:
More Fall Panoramas
Oct
13
2009
Related posts:
About Nasim Mansurovis a professional photographer based out of Denver, Colorado. He is the author and founder of The Mansurovs, along with a number of other online resources. Read more about Nasim here.
Which lens you used for it ??
cool picture
Abhinav, thank you for your feedback! For most of my landscape photography, I use the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 lens.
thanks a lot :) .Well ,Currently I have D40 and planning to upgrade to either D90 or D300s (I will love to add D700 ,but its doesn’t seem soo :|) .Plus I wanna get all purpose lens thats fast ,sharp and wide .(not 18-200mm )
Currently ,I have 10-24mm + old 24-85mm f2.8-4D (doesn’t auto focus on my D40 ,but manual focus doesn’t bother me much ) + 70-300mm .
I always felt that anything below 16mm(we can say 24mm on 35mm film ) is useless for landscape (things become too small ).
now my question is should I get Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VC or Nikon 17-55m f2.8 .I can get Tamron in a weeks time ,but will have to wait for while to get Nikon (bit expensive )
I felt Nikon is due for an upgrade and doesn’t have VR either(leaving aside its pro body thing ) or due to think getting nikon 17-55mm will worth or maybe nikon release an upgrade version of it soon .
Will love to know your opinion on this :)
Abhinav,
I personally would neither get the Tamron nor the Nikon 17-55mm, but rather the 14-24mm f/2.8G. It is one of the sharpest Nikon lenses ever and it is superb for landscape photography. The only problem with it is that it cannot hold any filters, but I believe there are some solutions and workarounds out there by now. If you really want to use filters, then get the Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8 lens instead.
The 17-55mm lens is excellent, but it is DX and if you happen to buy a Nikon full-frame body in the future, you will not be able to use it…