<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: How to Submit Photos to Foodgawker and Tastespotting</title> <atom:link href="http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting</link> <description>The Mansurovs provide various digital photography tips, tutorials and guides to photographers</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Sylvie (A Pot of Tea)</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting#comment-14844</link> <dc:creator>Sylvie (A Pot of Tea)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:49:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8224#comment-14844</guid> <description>Hi Lola, that&#039;s some useful tips there. You are right in that it&#039;s not just pictures taken with an SLR that get accepted. I&#039;ve even taken one with my mobile phone camera and got it on. However, have you come across the problem that your original looks great on screen, but once you&#039;ve uplaoded it to either of the two sites, the coours look a lot duller? Any suggestions? I get some accepted and some not......I guess that&#039;s life, but feel overcoming the problem I mention might help.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lola, that&#8217;s some useful tips there. You are right in that it&#8217;s not just pictures taken with an SLR that get accepted. I&#8217;ve even taken one with my mobile phone camera and got it on. However, have you come across the problem that your original looks great on screen, but once you&#8217;ve uplaoded it to either of the two sites, the coours look a lot duller? Any suggestions?<br /> I get some accepted and some not&#8230;&#8230;I guess that&#8217;s life, but feel overcoming the problem I mention might help.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ambika</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting#comment-12128</link> <dc:creator>Ambika</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:27:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8224#comment-12128</guid> <description>Hi!! Thanks a ton for your helpful tips!! I also had the problem of my images losing color as soon as they were uploaded on foodgawker/tastespotting. My first photo got accepted today, I&#039;m so glad!!! I have to thank you for the photoshop tips, I also read a couple of other articles and I hope I can improve my photography!! I have a Nikon D3000 and am just learning to use it optimally..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!! Thanks a ton for your helpful tips!! I also had the problem of my images losing color as soon as they were uploaded on foodgawker/tastespotting. My first photo got accepted today, I&#8217;m so glad!!! I have to thank you for the photoshop tips, I also read a couple of other articles and I hope I can improve my photography!! I have a Nikon D3000 and am just learning to use it optimally..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: laura</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting#comment-11915</link> <dc:creator>laura</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:17:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8224#comment-11915</guid> <description>Nice article. Question though. I did everything above however when I submitted to tastespotting it still prompted me to crop even though I cropped in ps. Do you know how to avoid this. Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Question though. I did everything above however when I submitted to tastespotting it still prompted me to crop even though I cropped in ps. Do you know how to avoid this.<br /> Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Valerie</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting#comment-11696</link> <dc:creator>Valerie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:11:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8224#comment-11696</guid> <description>Brilliant post! I knew about lighting and background noise, but I never considered the angle and size of the photos. Thank you for those tips!And you&#039;re right, one does not necessarily need a DSLR (although I have frequent dreams about owning one). My Canon point and shoot has seen me through a lot of tough scrapes. We started out a bit rocky, but once you know what your camera is capable of, you&#039;re relationship will be much more amicable. I know my camera&#039;s limits as well as her strengths (yes, I named her). :DThe best thing I did was to finally read the manual, something I put off far too long. Knowledge is power...and so is natural light!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant post! I knew about lighting and background noise, but I never considered the angle and size of the photos. Thank you for those tips!</p><p>And you&#8217;re right, one does not necessarily need a DSLR (although I have frequent dreams about owning one). My Canon point and shoot has seen me through a lot of tough scrapes. We started out a bit rocky, but once you know what your camera is capable of, you&#8217;re relationship will be much more amicable. I know my camera&#8217;s limits as well as her strengths (yes, I named her). :D</p><p>The best thing I did was to finally read the manual, something I put off far too long. Knowledge is power&#8230;and so is natural light!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mandragoras</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting#comment-11281</link> <dc:creator>Mandragoras</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:35:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8224#comment-11281</guid> <description>Thx for the work and for sharing ,,,, but i will try it further my way ,, just for on Reason ,,,the world is not a square ,,,food doesn&#039;t  ,,,Pictures doesn&#039;t  and Fibunacci didn&#039;t work either in 250X250  ;D ... btw,,,,it kills the variety ,all pictures in high Key makes all look the same .....my two cents :D .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx for the work and for sharing ,,,, but i will try it further my way ,, just for on Reason ,,,the world is not a square ,,,food doesn&#8217;t  ,,,Pictures doesn&#8217;t  and Fibunacci didn&#8217;t work either in 250X250  ;D &#8230; btw,,,,it kills the variety ,all pictures in high Key makes all look the same &#8230;..my two cents :D .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brighteyedbaker</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting#comment-3336</link> <dc:creator>Brighteyedbaker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:52:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8224#comment-3336</guid> <description>Hi, I&#039;ve been coming back to this post in my ongoing attempt to get something accepted at tastespotting or foodgawker. You&#039;re tips have helped me, but I&#039;m still getting rejections and I&#039;m wondering if you could give me some pointers based on my photos. Most of my rejections seem to be because of composition, but I&#039;m not sure what this means and what about the composition of my photos is not to like.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br /> I&#8217;ve been coming back to this post in my ongoing attempt to get something accepted at tastespotting or foodgawker. You&#8217;re tips have helped me, but I&#8217;m still getting rejections and I&#8217;m wondering if you could give me some pointers based on my photos. Most of my rejections seem to be because of composition, but I&#8217;m not sure what this means and what about the composition of my photos is not to like.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sweet Tea with Cindy</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting#comment-3335</link> <dc:creator>Sweet Tea with Cindy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:05:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8224#comment-3335</guid> <description>Wow! What great information! Thank you so much for all the helpful suggestions! Sincerely, Cindy Eckhart of Sweet Tea with Cindy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! What great information! Thank you so much for all the helpful suggestions! Sincerely, Cindy Eckhart of Sweet Tea with Cindy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Beth K.</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting#comment-3334</link> <dc:creator>Beth K.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:00:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8224#comment-3334</guid> <description>I am using Photoshop Elements to edit my pictures. I have followed all of your steps and one picture worked perfectly.  I&#039;ve tried a few others and once they are reduced to 250 x 250 pixels they are completely pixelated. The pictures look great at their original size and on my Hungry Happenings blog, so I am unsure why they look so bad once reduced.  Is that a sign of a bad photo, or am I doing something wrong in Photoshop. Or, am I taking the pictures at too high or low megapixel setting? I just bought a new Canon S95 point and shoot camera and would love to know what settings to use so that I could possibly get a photo accepted by foodgawker.com.  Thanks for your help.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using Photoshop Elements to edit my pictures. I have followed all of your steps and one picture worked perfectly.  I&#8217;ve tried a few others and once they are reduced to 250 x 250 pixels they are completely pixelated. The pictures look great at their original size and on my Hungry Happenings blog, so I am unsure why they look so bad once reduced.  Is that a sign of a bad photo, or am I doing something wrong in Photoshop. Or, am I taking the pictures at too high or low megapixel setting? I just bought a new Canon S95 point and shoot camera and would love to know what settings to use so that I could possibly get a photo accepted by foodgawker.com.  Thanks for your help.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nasim Mansurov</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting#comment-3333</link> <dc:creator>Nasim Mansurov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:07:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8224#comment-3333</guid> <description>Thank you for sharing Gracie! I believe Lola had similar frustrations with Tastespotting...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing Gracie! I believe Lola had similar frustrations with Tastespotting&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gracie</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-submit-photos-to-foodgawker-and-tastespotting#comment-3332</link> <dc:creator>Gracie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 03:36:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8224#comment-3332</guid> <description>Very helpful post! To be honest, I&#039;ve no problems with Foodgawker and usually find their rejections valid and reasonable.    On the other hand, I find Tastespotting sporadic in their rejections and have come to the sad conclusion that the editorial team doesn&#039;t really know what they&#039;re doing.  I understand the review process is subjective, but surely it can&#039;t be that random.  A casual review of what&#039;s posted on Tastespotting also indicates a certain level of randomness on the quality of photos deemed &quot;acceptable&quot; by their editorial team.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very helpful post!<br /> To be honest, I&#8217;ve no problems with Foodgawker and usually find their rejections valid and reasonable.    On the other hand, I find Tastespotting sporadic in their rejections and have come to the sad conclusion that the editorial team doesn&#8217;t really know what they&#8217;re doing.  I understand the review process is subjective, but surely it can&#8217;t be that random.  A casual review of what&#8217;s posted on Tastespotting also indicates a certain level of randomness on the quality of photos deemed &#8220;acceptable&#8221; by their editorial team.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: mansurovs.com @ 2012-02-11 09:21:37 by W3 Total Cache -->
