<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: How to Obtain Maximum Bokeh</title> <atom:link href="http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh</link> <description>The Mansurovs provide various digital photography tips, tutorials and guides to photographers</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Angela G.</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh#comment-12667</link> <dc:creator>Angela G.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:32:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8011#comment-12667</guid> <description>Very good and succinct article.  I guess learning about the interplay of these factors with different subjects and lenses is just a matter of experience.  5 and 6 are pretty much a different way to express points 1 and 4 and are often discussed in articles about bokeh, but points 2 and 3 are also very important and they don&#039;t cost money to control.  Many photographers covet super fast lenses such as the 50 1.2, when a 70-200 f4 would create gorgeous bokeh for most portraits at a more affordable price...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good and succinct article.  I guess learning about the interplay of these factors with different subjects and lenses is just a matter of experience.  5 and 6 are pretty much a different way to express points 1 and 4 and are often discussed in articles about bokeh, but points 2 and 3 are also very important and they don&#8217;t cost money to control.  Many photographers covet super fast lenses such as the 50 1.2, when a 70-200 f4 would create gorgeous bokeh for most portraits at a more affordable price&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nasim Mansurov</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh#comment-11880</link> <dc:creator>Nasim Mansurov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:07:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8011#comment-11880</guid> <description>Aaron, you are right - the Nikon 50mm f/1.4 is considered a &quot;normal&quot; lens and some pros hate its bokeh when compared to 135mm DC or 200mm f/2. However, people that cannot afford exotic optics look for cheaper solutions and the Nikon 50mm f/1.4 or the Nikon 50mm f/1.8 are great alternatives that will create beautiful bokeh when compared to cheap consumer zoom lenses. In addition, don&#039;t forget about the crop factor on DX bodies that affects the field of view on the 50mm equivalent to 75mm, which is a portrait range. And lastly, the above article is for beginners :)II will be working on a separate article on bokeh for advanced photographers very soon, after I am done with my articles on optics.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, you are right &#8211; the Nikon 50mm f/1.4 is considered a &#8220;normal&#8221; lens and some pros hate its bokeh when compared to 135mm DC or 200mm f/2. However, people that cannot afford exotic optics look for cheaper solutions and the Nikon 50mm f/1.4 or the Nikon 50mm f/1.8 are great alternatives that will create beautiful bokeh when compared to cheap consumer zoom lenses. In addition, don&#8217;t forget about the crop factor on DX bodies that affects the field of view on the 50mm equivalent to 75mm, which is a portrait range. And lastly, the above article is for beginners :)</p><p>II will be working on a separate article on bokeh for advanced photographers very soon, after I am done with my articles on optics.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aaron</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh#comment-11865</link> <dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:53:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8011#comment-11865</guid> <description>Thank you for the interesting article. I disagree, however with saying a 50mm lens is a portrait lens. Also, fast lenses often suffer from Bokeh fringing, so with a 1.4 lens you are likely to have magenta and green halos in your Bokeh.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the interesting article. I disagree, however with saying a 50mm lens is a portrait lens. Also, fast lenses often suffer from Bokeh fringing, so with a 1.4 lens you are likely to have magenta and green halos in your Bokeh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Swami</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh#comment-11640</link> <dc:creator>Swami</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:20:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8011#comment-11640</guid> <description>How do you balance between point 2 and 4?  Say I am taking a portrait...I can either move very close to my subject, in which case, I will have to be completely zoomed out, OR, I can stay far and zoom in to the subject.  Point 2 says I should move close to the subject, and point 4 says I should zoom in as much as possible.  Given then I am able to do either, which one takes priority, point 2 or 4? Should I move as closely as possible first, then zoom in more if necessary, or should I zoom in as much as I can first, and then move closer as needed?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you balance between point 2 and 4?  Say I am taking a portrait&#8230;I can either move very close to my subject, in which case, I will have to be completely zoomed out, OR, I can stay far and zoom in to the subject.  Point 2 says I should move close to the subject, and point 4 says I should zoom in as much as possible.  Given then I am able to do either, which one takes priority, point 2 or 4? Should I move as closely as possible first, then zoom in more if necessary, or should I zoom in as much as I can first, and then move closer as needed?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nasim Mansurov</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh#comment-3265</link> <dc:creator>Nasim Mansurov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 07:30:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8011#comment-3265</guid> <description>Vinay, yes, maximum aperture and longer focal lengths are mutually exclusive in a way when it comes to variable aperture zoom lenses, but it all depends on lens optics. On some lenses, the aperture does not change up to a certain focal length, while other lenses are at f/5.6 long before the longest focal length is reached. Unfortunately, there is no way to keep the aperture at a certain fixed value - it is the lens design and the zoom mechanism that control the aperture.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vinay, yes, maximum aperture and longer focal lengths are mutually exclusive in a way when it comes to variable aperture zoom lenses, but it all depends on lens optics. On some lenses, the aperture does not change up to a certain focal length, while other lenses are at f/5.6 long before the longest focal length is reached. Unfortunately, there is no way to keep the aperture at a certain fixed value &#8211; it is the lens design and the zoom mechanism that control the aperture.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vinay</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh#comment-3264</link> <dc:creator>Vinay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 05:43:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8011#comment-3264</guid> <description>Dear Nasim , The article on bokehs is excellent but I am extremely confused about one basic principle. Are not maximum aperture and longer focal lengths mutually exclusive ? In a typical kit lens 18mm to 55mm the  aperture is 3.5 to 5.6. Is it possible to fix the aperture at 3.5 even for a focal length of 55mm? In my very limited experience even in the Aperture Priority mode the aperture automatically changes the moment focal length changes. I use a Nikon d 3100. I am not able to follow how the photographer can select  /  FIX the aperture in the A mode when it keeps changing when the focal length is adjusted? Sorry for the long and possibly extremely basic query but I hope you can help . Thanks Vinay</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Nasim ,<br /> The article on bokehs is excellent but I am extremely confused about one basic principle. Are not maximum aperture and longer focal lengths mutually exclusive ? In a typical kit lens 18mm to 55mm the  aperture is 3.5 to 5.6. Is it possible to fix the aperture at 3.5 even for a focal length of 55mm? In my very limited experience even in the Aperture Priority mode the aperture automatically changes the moment focal length changes. I use a Nikon d 3100. I am not able to follow how the photographer can select  /  FIX the aperture in the A mode when it keeps changing when the focal length is adjusted?<br /> Sorry for the long and possibly extremely basic query but I hope you can help .<br /> Thanks<br /> Vinay</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nasim Mansurov</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh#comment-3263</link> <dc:creator>Nasim Mansurov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:18:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8011#comment-3263</guid> <description>Ravi,The Nikon 50mm will certainly help for portraits. As far as your Tamron, I would try f/8.0 to see if you can get sharp results. If you cannot, then you probably have a bad copy of the lens...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravi,</p><p>The Nikon 50mm will certainly help for portraits. As far as your Tamron, I would try f/8.0 to see if you can get sharp results. If you cannot, then you probably have a bad copy of the lens&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ravi Rai</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh#comment-3262</link> <dc:creator>Ravi Rai</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:20:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8011#comment-3262</guid> <description>Hi Nassin,First of all, thank you very much for sharing very informative and sharing knowledge, I guess it’s a gift to the rest of the world from you. Thank you again.My question - I have D3000 and I bought Tamron 70-300mm macro lense. I love taking Bokeh pictures and its quite nice performance I am getting but the sharpness is my concers. When I take portraits the sharpness falls. So, please suggest me the perfect aperture for sharp pictures. After reading your article I am planning to buy 50mm nikor.Thanks &amp; regards Ravi</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nassin,</p><p> First of all, thank you very much for sharing very informative and sharing knowledge, I guess it’s a gift to the rest of the world from you. Thank you again.</p><p>My question &#8211; I have D3000 and I bought Tamron 70-300mm macro lense. I love taking Bokeh pictures and its quite nice performance I am getting but the sharpness is my concers. When I take portraits the sharpness falls. So, please suggest me the perfect aperture for sharp pictures. After reading your article I am planning to buy 50mm nikor.</p><p>Thanks &amp; regards<br /> Ravi</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eduardo Siqueira</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh#comment-3261</link> <dc:creator>Eduardo Siqueira</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:05:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8011#comment-3261</guid> <description>Nassin, thanks for your help. Regards, Eduardo.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nassin, thanks for your help. Regards, Eduardo.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nasim Mansurov</title><link>http://mansurovs.com/how-to-obtain-maximum-bokeh#comment-3260</link> <dc:creator>Nasim Mansurov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:19:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://mansurovs.com/?p=8011#comment-3260</guid> <description>Eduardo, the 18-55m will not yield good-looking bokeh. I would go for a portrait lens like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://mansurovs.com/go/bh/nikon-50mm-f14g&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nikon 50mm f/1.4G&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://mansurovs.com/go/bh/nikon-35mm-f18g&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nikon 35mm f/1.8G&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eduardo, the 18-55m will not yield good-looking bokeh. I would go for a portrait lens like the <a href="http://mansurovs.com/go/bh/nikon-50mm-f14g" rel="nofollow">Nikon 50mm f/1.4G</a> or <a href="http://mansurovs.com/go/bh/nikon-35mm-f18g" rel="nofollow">Nikon 35mm f/1.8G</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: mansurovs.com @ 2012-05-22 14:38:18 by W3 Total Cache -->
